PART C
Nguyen v. Her Majesty the Queen, Federal Court File No. T-1778-15
“IRPR Regulations pertaining to Non-MTRV applications”
Immigration Act Fees Regulations SOR/97-22, P.C. 1996-2003 Coming into Force; January 2, 1997
1 Permanent Resident Application-Business Class $1000 Sch. (Section 3) item 2(4)(a) Column III
2 Dependents (<19, not a spouse) $100 Sch. (Section 3) item 1(2) Column III; Item 2(2), Column III; Item 2(5), Column III;
Item 2(7) Column III
3 Employment Authorizations $150-individual; $450-group Sch. (Section 3) item 5(1) Column III; Item 6 Column III
4 Extension of Visitor Status $75 Sch. (Section 3) Item 3(1)(a)(b) Column II, Column III
5 Visitor Visa – Single entry $75 single entry Sch. (Section 3) item 3, (1)(a)(b), Column III
6 Visitor Visa $400 family maximum Sch. (Section 3) item 4(a)(b), Column III
7 Student Authorization $125 Sch. (Section 3) Item 7(1), Column III
Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations SOR/2002-227, June 11, 2002
8 Permanent Resident Visa – member of the investor class – principal applicant $1050 s. 295(1)(b)(i)
9 Permanent Resident Visa – member of the investor class – a family member of the principal applicant who is 22 yrs of
age or older or is less than 22 yrs of age and is a spouse or common-law partner $550 s. 295(1)(b)(ii)
10 Permanent Resident Visa – member of the investor class - a family member of the principal applicant who is less than
22 yrs old and is not a spouse or common-law partner $150 s. 295(1)(b)(iii)
11 Permanent Resident Visa - member of any other class or by a person referred to in s. 71 - principal applicant $550
s. 295(1)(c)(i)
12 Permanent Resident Visa - member of any other class or by a person referred to in s. 71 - a family member of the
principal applicant who is 22 yrs of age or older or is less than 22 yrs of age and is a spouse or common-law partne
$550 s. 295(1)(c)(ii)
13 Permanent Resident Visa - member of any other class or by a person referred to in s. 71 - a family member of the
principal applicant who is less than 22 yrs old and is not a spouse or common-law partner $150 s. 295(1)(c)(iii)
14 Payment by sponsor in respect of an application as a member of a family class or their family members $475 + $75
s. 295(3)(a) & s. 304(1)
15 Temporary Resident Visa $75 single entry s. 296(1)
16 Temporary Resident Visas $400 family maximum s. 296(3), 297(2)
17 Work permits $150-single; $450-maximum group s. 299(1); s. 299(3)
18 Study Permits $125 s. 300(1)
19 Permanent Resident Visa – member of the live-in caregiver class or as a protected person under 175(1) in respect of a
principal applicant $550 s. 301(1)(b)(i)
20 Permanent Resident Visa - member of the live-in caregiver class or as a protected person under 175(1) in respect of a
family member of the principal applicant who is 22 yrs of age or older or is less than 22 yrs of age and is a spouse or
common-law partner $550 s. 301(1)(b)(ii)
21 Permanent Resident Visa - member of the live-in caregiver class or as a protected person under 175(1) in respect of a
family member of the principal applicant who is less than 22 yrs old and is not a spouse or common-law partner $150
s. 301(1)(b)(iii)
22 Payment by sponsor in respect of an application as a member of the spouse or common-law partner in Canada class or
their family members $475 + $75 s. 301(2)(a) & s.304(1)
23 Extension of Authority to remain in Canada as a temporary resident $75 s. 305(1)
Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations SOR/2014-19, January 28, 2015
24 Work Permit $155; $465-maximum group s. 299.(1); s. 299.(3)
25 Study Permit $150 s. 300.(1)
Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations SOR/2014-19, s. 2. January 29, 2014, s. 296(1)
26 Single or multiple entry — $100 296. (1) A fee of $100 is payable for processing an application for a temporary resident visa to enter Canada one or more times.”
PART B
Nguyen v. Her Majesty the Queen, Federal Court File No. T-1778-15
“IRPR Regulations pertaining to MTRV applications”
Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations SOR/2002-227, June 11, 2002 s. 297(1)
1 June 11, 2002 $150 multiple entry
“Multiple entry — $150 297. (1) A fee of $150 is payable for processing an application for a temporary resident visa to enter Canada more than once.”
PART A
Court File Numbers: IMM-5015-06
IMM-3195-08
IMM-3197-08
CLASS PROCEEDING
FEDERAL COURT
BETWEEN:
ALAN HINTON
IRENA HINTON
Plaintiffs
AND:
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Defendant
and
Court File Number: IMM-3196-08
FEDERAL COURT
BETWEEN:
SVETLANA POTAPOVA
NIKOLAY POTAPOV
Plaintiffs
AND:
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Defendant
and
Court File Number: T-1778-15
PROPOSED CLASS PROCEEDING
FEDERAL COURT
BETWEEN:
THI QUYNH CHI NGUYEN
Plaintiff
AND:
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Defendant
and
Court File Number: IMM-1669-05
FEDERAL COURT
BETWEEN:
BAZ SINGH MOMI ET. AL.
Plaintiffs
AND:
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Defendant
and
Court File IMM-1270-07
FEDERAL COURT
BETWEEN:
DMYTRO MAKAROV
Applicant
and
THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION
Respondent
and
Court File Number: IMM-1116-08
FEDERAL COURT
BETWEEN:
SVETLANA POTAPOVA
NIKOLAY POTAPOV
Plaintiffs
AND:
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Defendant
ORDER
WHEREAS the parties have entered into an agreement (the “Agreement”) with respect to these proceedings, a copy of which is attached as Schedule “A” to this Order;
WHEREAS the Agreement shall only be binding if this Court approves all the terms and all the steps that are enumerated therein;
WHEREAS the parties have advised this Court of the Agreement;
WHEREAS the parties have brought a motion, by consent, for an order to approve all the terms of the Agreement and to implement the Agreement in its entirety;
WHEREAS the parties have reached agreements regarding the “numbers” arising out of the available CMM data (with caveats) as is set out Schedule “B” and Schedule “C” attached to this Order;
WHEREAS this Court is satisfied that approving all the terms of the Agreement and implementing the Agreement in its entirety will secure the just, most expeditious and least expensive determination of these proceedings on their merits;
UPON considering the Agreement, the Affidavits of Richard Kurland, the Affidavit of Alan Hinton, the Affidavit of Thi Quynh Chi Ngyuen, the Affidavit of Karine Paré, Rules 3, 55 and 334.19 of the Federal Courts Rules, and the submissions of counsel;
THIS COURT ORDERS that:
The motion is granted.
The Agreement attached as Schedule A hereto and all the terms and steps enumerated therein are approved in their entirety.
Pursuant to paragraph 1 of the Agreement:
The parties’ agreement to adjourn sine die and hold in abeyance the pending appeal of the Order of Justice Harrington dated March 1, 2017 (A-96-17), which expanded the Hinton class from April 1, 2004 to March 31, 2007, with respect to MTRV fees (the “Defendant’s Appeal”) is accepted;
The Defendant shall have a right to assert a limitation period defence with respect to MTRV fees paid between April 1, 2004 and March 31, 2007, even if the limitation bar issue based on the test for certification that is the subject of the Defendant’s Appeal is ultimately determined against the Defendant;
There shall be no prejudice to either party arising solely out of the passage of time as a result of the adjournment and holding in abeyance of the Defendant’s Appeal.
Pursuant to paragraph 2 of the Agreement, nothing limits the parties or prevents the parties from seeking such other determinations of fact, law or mixed fact and law as they see fit in the Hinton class proceeding, including, without limitation, on such matters as “numbers”, costs blending, disputed costs, etc. with respect to MTRV fees paid between April 1, 2004 and March 31, 2007, where those determinations may be relevant to any action to recover profits made during this time period, for example, determinations relating to whether there were any patterns in the Defendant’s actions or decision-making.
Pursuant to paragraph 3 of the Agreement, the Hinton claims with respect to all the non-MTRV fees are dismissed on the merits.
Pursuant to paragraph 4 of the Agreement, the Nguyen proposed class proceeding with respect to the MTRV fees that were paid between October 21, 2009 and March 31, 2014 is certified as a class proceeding. The class proceeding regarding these MTRV fees shall be referred to as the “MTRV Sub-Class”.
Pursuant to paragraph 5 of the Agreement:
The Nguyen claims with respect to the MTRV fees paid between April 1, 2004 and October 20, 2009 are held in abeyance, without certification;
There shall be no prejudice to either party arising solely out of the passage of time as a result of this adjournment (including, but not limited to, with respect to limitation issues).
Pursuant to paragraph 6 of the Agreement, nothing in the Agreement limits the parties or prevents them from seeking such other determinations of fact, law or mixed fact and law as they see fit in the Nguyen class proceeding, including, without limitation, on such matters as “numbers”, costs blending, disputed costs, etc. with respect to MTRV fees paid between April 1, 2004 and October 20, 2009 where those determinations may be relevant to any action to recover profits made during this time period (for example, determinations relating to whether there were any patterns in the Defendant’s actions or decision-making).
Pursuant to paragraph 7 of the Agreement, the claims related to non-MTRV fees paid between April 1, 2004 and October 20, 2009 are dismissed in the Nguyen certification motion and the claims related to non-MTRV fees paid between October 21, 2009 and March 31, 2015 are certified in the Nguyen certification motion. The class proceeding regarding the claims of those who paid non-MTRV fees between October 21, 2009 and March 31, 2015 shall be referred to as the “Non-MTRV Sub-Class”.
A Notice shall be prepared by the parties, in a form acceptable to and approved by this Court, notifying the MTRV Sub-Class and the Non-MTRV Sub-Class regarding this class proceeding, regarding the fact that the parties intend to bring a motion after the end of the opt-out period to dismiss the claims of the Non-MTRV Sub-Class on the merits, and regarding the right to opt-out of this class proceeding.
Pursuant to paragraph 8 of the Agreement, the Hinton and Nguyen class proceeding with respect to the MTRV fees, if tried, shall be tried together or immediately one after the other.
Pursuant to paragraph 9 of the Agreement, disclosure and discovery regarding MTRVs shall include the fiscal years April 1, 2004 to March 31, 2014.
Pursuant to paragraph 11 of the Agreement:
the claims in Momi, Potapova and Makarov (and any other overlapping action(s) or proceeding(s) where the plaintiffs or applicants are represented by the Plaintiffs’ counsel), are dismissed, on the merits, with respect to non-MTRV fees. (Specifically, the applications/proposed class proceedings in Momi (IMM-1669-05 re 52 fees paid between April 1, 1994 and March 11, 2005), in Makarov (IMM-1270-07 re sponsorship, PR processing and right of landing fees paid on September 15, 2005) and, in Potapova (IMM-1116-08 re STRV fee paid on Feb 25 2004);
Any MTRV fee claims in these proceedings shall be dismissed, but not on the merits, and the individual claims of the named individual plaintiffs who paid MTRV fees in these proceedings shall be resolved in accordance with the determinations made in Hinton or Nguyen.
The whole of this Order shall be without costs.